I'm using a Sync Rule to provision to AD and using an attribute constructed in a custom workflow (ADdn) to set the DN. This works perfectly well when doing the initial flow and provision, but if the user moves department and the custom workflow rebuilds the ADdn attribute then the AD MA only sees this as attribute flow, not a provisioning rename. If I cocatenate an empty string on the end of the attribute flow rule definition in the sync rule, the MA recognizes the change as a provisioning rename.
This feels like a bug and although we have a workaround I'm curious to know if anyone else has seen this or can reproduce to confirm before I submit. We have reproduced on two different installations here.
Cheers,
Dave
